State Executive Committee Precedent Manual
Part One. Organization and Rules
The University Interscholastic League (UIL) is the state-wide organization that oversees academic, athletic and music competitions between the students of its member public and private schools. The UIL Constitution and Contest Rules (C&CR) provide that the State Executive Committee (SEC) provide independent and impartial direction on the league by:
(1) interpreting the Constitution and Contest Rules;
(2) enforcing the rules and regulations contained in the Constitution and Contest Rules;
(3) conducting any necessary recount of a referendum vote;
(4) determining disputes within its original jurisdiction; and
(5) hearing appeals within its appellate jurisdiction.
The State Executive Committee, appointed by the Commissioner of the Texas Education Agency, is composed of eight school administrators, representing each of the four geographical regions and each of the six conferences, and a minimum of four-at-large members. This committee interprets the rules, settles disputes between different UIL districts and disputes which arise past the district level, conducts investigations and hearings of alleged violations, and hears appeals.
In accord with Section 26 (g), the State Executive Committee Precedent Manual will be composed of written decisions that contain a synopsis of the facts along with the panel’s decision and a brief explanation of the basis for the decision in each case that a hearing panel deems to have precedential value.
For cases to be designated as having precedential value, a written decision must be approved by, as applicable, a majority of the SEC or the panel that heard the case before it may be published in the Precedent Manual. The Precedent Manual shall serve as a guide for future hearings and interested parties when considering the possible outcome of a case.
- Applicable UIL Constitution and Contest Rules
The following sections of the UIL Constitution and Contest Rules cover the State Executive Committee and related processes:
Section 26, STATE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Section 27, PENALTIES THE STATE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE CAN IMPOSE
Section 50: CLASSIFICATION OF STUDENT VIOLATIONS
Section 51: CLASSIFICATION OF SCHOOL DISTRICT PERSONNEL VIOLATIONS
Section 52: CLASSIFICATION OF UIL SCHOOL VIOLATIONS
Section 53: CONDUCT SUBJECT TO PROTEST
Section 54: FILING A PROTEST
Section 55: REPORT OF VIOLATION
Section 56: INVESTIGATION OF PROTESTS OR ALLEGATIONS
Section 100: GENERAL; HEARINGS
Section 150: APPEALS
See UIL Constitution and Contest Rules @
Part Two. Decisions
16-0817-02: Age Rule (5-4 Grant)
Appellant’s former superintendent stated that the student met all criteria for an overage waiver, including being retained in the 5th and 6th grades due to a disability that delayed his education for a year or more.
16-0817-05: Moving for Athletic Reasons (6-3 Grant)
Appellant’s father claimed to have moved after the third varsity football game to another district for health and financial reasons despite having concerns about Appellant’s football position and playing time. Appellant established residency in the district through the McKinney-Vento Education of Homeless Children and Youth Assistance Act.
16-0913-02: Moving for Athletic Reasons (4-0 Grant)
Appellant’s father claimed that he put his home on the market at a high price, and decided to sell after someone agreed to purchase the home at the price he was asking. The coach at Appellant’s previous school marked that the student moved for athletic purposes on the Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPF) because he believed the student moved in order to raise his GPA in order to be eligible to attend a Division 1 (D1) college after graduation.
16-0927-02: Moving for Athletic Reasons (5-0 Grant)
Appellant’s guardian claimed to have rented a home with a family member and transferred Appellant from his previous school (School A) to his new school (School B) after the football season started strictly for financial reasons.
16-0927-04: Moving for Athletic Reasons (5-0 Grant)
Appellant’s mother claimed to have moved to a new school district because Appellant was having academic and discipline issues at his previous school (School A). It was determined by a DEC that Appellant moved to the new school (School B) for athletic reasons. After attending School B for one semester, Appellant then participated in workouts, football practices, and a scrimmage with another school (School C) during the summer without enrolling at the school. On the first day of the new school year, Appellant then transferred back to School A, where he previously had academic and discipline problems.