UIL Speech Judges

Judging qualifications:
I have coached CX and LD debate for two years and have experience working with students across a wide range of argument styles, from traditional policy-making and values debate to kritikal and theory-heavy approaches. I am comfortable judging CX, LD, and Congressional Debate, and I evaluate rounds primarily on the flow. My judging philosophy emphasizes clarity, warranted analysis, clash, and strong impact comparison. I am open to all arguments as long as they are well explained and impacted. In Congress, I reward evidence-based speeches that directly engage with previous arguments, as well as thoughtful, respectful questioning. Across all events, I strive to be a fair and attentive judge who evaluates what happens in the round rather than relying on personal preference.