Skip to main content
Image of UT logo that reads The University of Texas at Austin
University Interscholastic League Logo
University Interscholastic League Logo

UIL Speech Judges

If you have corrections, questions or comments regarding this information, please notify The UIL Speech and Debate department at speech@uiltexas.org or 512-471-5883.

Andy Glenn

Current high school:
Ferris

Currently coaching?: Yes

Conference: 4A

Number of years coached: 4

Number of tournaments judged: 6

High school attended:
Kerens High School

Graduated high school: 1993

Participated in high school: No

Participated in college: No

Judging qualifications:
Qualifications: I have served in ministry and public preaching for over 25 years. During that time, I have consistently engaged in extemporaneous speaking before live audiences multiple times each week. This has required me to research a wide range of subjects, organize thoughts quickly, adapt messages to specific audiences, and communicate clearly and persuasively. In addition, I have experience training others in public speaking and communication, with an emphasis on clarity, structure, and audience connection. This background has given me a practical and professional foundation for evaluating speakers in Extemporaneous Speaking. Philosophy: When judging Extemp, I look for a speaker who demonstrates three key qualities: Content and Organization – Clear thesis, logical structure, and well-supported arguments. I value evidence that is accurate and relevant, but also presented in a way that helps the audience understand the "big picture." Delivery and Communication – Confident, natural, and conversational speaking that maintains eye contact, engages the audience, and avoids unnecessary filler. A polished delivery should enhance the message, not distract from it. Analysis and Application – Beyond reciting facts, I want to see the speaker explain why it matters and apply their ideas to real-world contexts. The best Extemp speeches show insight and offer a reasoned perspective. I do not judge based on whether I personally agree with a speaker’s conclusions. My role is to evaluate how effectively they constructed, supported, and delivered their case. I appreciate speakers who show poise under pressure, originality of thought, and the ability to connect with their audience.

Judging Philosophy

CX

Rounds judged: NA
Judging approach:
Policy priority:
Evidence philosophy:
Paradigm:

LD

Rounds judged: NA
Approach:
Philosophy:

Contact Information

email: aglenn@ferrisisd.org
cell: 210 4829335
office: 972 5443737

Availability Information

Meet types:
Invitational State Meet

Qualified for:
Extemp

Travel

Region of residence:
5

I will travel to: 1 2 5