Skip to main content
University of Texas at Austin
University Interscholastic League Logo
University Interscholastic League Logo

UIL Speech Judges

If you have corrections, questions or comments regarding this information, please notify The UIL Speech and Debate department at speech@uiltexas.org or 512-471-5883.

Kalyn Mizelle McDaniel

Current high school:
None

Currently coaching?: No

Conference:

Number of years coached:

Number of tournaments judged: 0

High school attended:
Smithson Valley High School

Graduated high school: 2016

Participated in high school: No

Participated in college: Yes

Judging qualifications:
I am a second-year JD candidate at the University of Texas School of Law. I compete on UT's interscholastic moot court team, and following graduation, I intend to work as a civil rights litigator. I grew up in a working-class family without exposure to the legal field, and I owe much of my path to law school to my experience as a collegiate debater. I came to college without any debate experience, and the team took a risk on me. That risk ultimately paid off due to my immediate success. In my first year, I won NCCFI nationals in CX debate and was the first-place speaker. Additionally, I was the first runner-up in LD at PKD nationals. I won various other speech awards throughout my first year. I competed again in my sophomore year but did not attend nationals because I studied abroad in Australia. When I returned to my university, I primarily focused on moot court. My short career in debate had a massive impact on me. I learned from some incredible coaches and teammates, many of whom are full-time debate coaches now. I judged local high school competitions throughout college as well. In the time between my undergrad and law school, I taught the LSAT. That experience cultivated my skills as an instructor. I tailor my instruction and feedback to each student and am eager to do the same as a judge.

Judging Philosophy

CX

Rounds judged: 0
Judging approach: Stock Issues
Policy priority: Communication skills and resolution of substantive issues are of equal importance
Evidence philosophy: Quality of evidence is more important than quantity of evidence
Paradigm: My legal background inclines me to have a strong preference for precision and careful use of language. I strongly prefer quality of evidence over quantity, and students who tailor their arguments carefully really impress me. I fall somewhere between a strict stock issue judge and one who values the integration of policy. I don't love spreading, but if I can follow it, I am not completely opposed. Ultimately, I want this experience to teach meaningful skills and I am eager to give practical feedback to students.

LD

Rounds judged: 0
Approach: Resolution of substantive issues is more important than communication skills
Philosophy:

Contact Information

email: mcdaniel.kalyn@gmail.com
cell:
office:

Availability Information

Meet types:
District Regional CX State State Meet

Qualified for:
CX
LD
Extemp
Prose/Poetry

Travel

Region of residence:
1

I will travel to: 1