Skip to main content
University of Texas at Austin
University Interscholastic League Logo
University Interscholastic League Logo

UIL Speech Judges

If you have corrections, questions or comments regarding this information, please notify The UIL Speech and Debate department at speech@uiltexas.org or 512-471-5883.

Tanya Galloway

Current high school:
None

Currently coaching?: No

Conference:

Number of years coached:

Number of tournaments judged: 5

High school attended:
MacArthur

Graduated high school: 1982

Participated in high school: Yes

Participated in college: Yes

Judging qualifications:
Tanya Reni Galloway I enjoy analyzing the quality of evidence, persuasive techniques, and presentation style of all debate categories. I have judged all debate categories over the past 10 plus years including Congress, FX, DX, CX, LD, PF, BQ, and WS. I am an old-school purist. I judge all categories so I prefer that each category stays in its own lane. Having said that, I realize many students love progressive argumentation, so I say tabula rasa, and I will judge the style they are trained in and give feedback accordingly. It is always about the student. My feedback and comments, on my ballots, are designed to empower the student to take their game in debate and life to the next level. I believe our speech and debate students are developing themselves as leaders and can use their skills to make profound differences when applied to areas of life that matter to them. I also judge all IE events. I love OO, when done well, it is like a mini TED talk. I love to see the WHY. Why did the student choose the topic or selection? What resonates for them? In the categories which require acting skills, I really look for a connection between the student and the selection, when the student embodies the selection and becomes the character. I believe acting skills can build empathy and connection to the human condition. These students can use these skills and happy them in an area of life that they are passionate about and make a difference in the world. They can be the voice for others, who do not have the courage or opportunity to speak or perform in front of others. I competed in high school and college and won awards in acting, singing, and public speaking events. I was a professional actress and trained at the Film Actors Lab. I am a trained toastmasters judge. I currently lecture on art as therapy. I am an enthusiastic supporter of academic sports. Speech and debate participation provides cognitive and behavioral enhancement. It improves reading, listening, speaking, critical thinking, and writing skills. It also improves motivation and increases curiosity and engagement. I enjoy empowering the future leaders of our community and world. I encourage the students to take the skills they are learning and to apply them to areas of life that are of concern to them now, so they can make a difference and learn the practical value of their skills. It increases engagement for both at-risk and gifted students. I also think coaches are rock stars! Thank you for the difference you make each day with your students. It takes heart, dedication, patience, and perseverance, You are the one they will always remember.

Judging Philosophy

CX

Rounds judged: 5
Judging approach: Tabula Rasa
Policy priority: Communication skills and resolution of substantive issues are of equal importance
Evidence philosophy: Quality of evidence is more important than quantity of evidence
Paradigm: I have been judging CX for 14 years. I am basically a stock issues judge, in my heart. I love to hear argumentation through a real world analysis grid. I believe that the students benefit the most when they train themselves to be powerful communicators, so style and quality of evidence is key. I would rather have word economy and powerful evidence presented well. I think when a student adds pathos, especially when dealing with subjects relating to human rights violations is a powerful addition to any case. Having said all that, I say tabula rasa, and I will judge the style they are trained in and give feedback accordingly. Spreading is acceptable, if it is articulate and tags and signposts are clear.

LD

Rounds judged: 15
Approach: Communication skills and resolution of substantive issues are of equal importance
Philosophy:
I have been judging LD for over 14 years. I judge all categories so, I prefer that each category stays in its own lane. LD is a Framework and value driven category, and I like to hear the ethos, logos, and even pathos in the case. Having said that, I realize many students love progressive argumentation and the CX style, so I say tabula rasa, and I will judge the style they are trained in and give feedback accordingly. It is always about the student. My feedback and comments, on my ballots, are designed to empower the student to take their game in debate and life to the next level. I believe our speech and debate students are developing themselves as leaders and can use their skills to make profound differences when applied to areas of life that matter to them.

Contact Information

email: tanya.r.galloway@gmail.com
cell: 469 6823393
office:

Availability Information

Meet types:
Invitational District Regional CX State State Meet Congress Region Congress State

Qualified for:
CX
LD
Extemp
Prose/Poetry
Congress

Travel

Region of residence:
2

I will travel to: 2 5 6