UIL Speech Judges
If you have corrections, questions or comments regarding this information, please notify The UIL Speech and Debate department at speech@uiltexas.org or 512-471-5883.
Aneesa Mulji
Current high school:
None
Currently coaching?: No
Conference:
Number of years coached: 1
Number of tournaments judged: 1
High school attended:
Community High School
Graduated high school: 2015
Participated in high school: Yes
Participated in college: Yes
Judging qualifications:
I use to participate in UIL for Prose/Poetry and HI/DI as well as spent 3 years in LD debate and learned CX debate but only went to 3 tournaments for it. I made it to state for LD my last year of high school and recently volunteered as a judge.
Judging Philosophy
CX
Judging approach: Policy Maker
Policy priority: Communication skills and resolution of substantive issues are of equal importance
Evidence philosophy: Quantity of evidence and quality of evidence are of equal importance
Paradigm: The quality of evidence as well as proper spreading that is still articulated and enunciated well for the competitor to comprehend as well as the judge is able to follow counters. They must procure a resolution/plan to the topic.
LD
Approach: Communication skills and resolution of substantive issues are of equal importance
Philosophy:
Philosophical evidence linked with criterions is paramount. Humanitarian rights is a common purpose, but not always the right one! The speech needs to be precise and clear of arguments as well as combat the opponent's case not leave it un-attacked.
Contact Information
email: aneesa16m@gmail.com
cell: 469 3215316
office:
Availability Information
Meet types:
Invitational
District
Regional
State Meet
Qualified for:
CX
LD
Prose/Poetry
Travel
Region of residence:
2
I will travel to: 1 2 3
