CONTEST EVALUATION CONTEST MANAGER'S 2023-24

THE ORIGIN OF THIS INFORMATION WILL BE KEPT STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL

For Contest Managers Only

1Adjudicator(s) Evaluation > 2Contest and Participants Evaluation > 3Review Your Entry
Date of the Contest Date of the Contest * / MM / DD YYYY
Your Name *
Your School or Affiliation (Retired) *
Your Address Your Address *
Street Address Address Line 2 City State / Province / Region Postal / Zip Code Country
Your Phone Your Phone * - ### - ### ####
Your Email *
The Contest Conference
The Contest Level *
The Contest Site *
Questions About the Adjudicators

Please answer the questions.
Adjudicator's Name (Acting Judge) *
Adjudicator's Name (If Paneling) *
Adjudicator's Name (If Paneling) *
1. Did the adjudicator arrive in sufficient time to be briefed by you concerning contest procedures, all-star cast selection, the critique, etc.? *

1. Did the adjudicator arrive in sufficient time to be briefed by you concerning contest procedures, all-star cast selection, the critique, etc.? Yes No
2. Did the Adjudicator meet with all participating directors prior to the contest to discuss judging procedures? If not, why? *

2. Did the Adjudicator meet with all participating directors prior to the contest to discuss judging procedures? If not, why? Yes No
3. So far as you can determine, did the adjudicator follow the Official League Judging Standards? *

3. So far as you can determine, did the adjudicator follow the Official League Judging Standards? Yes No
4. Did you believe the adjudicator was critical of any director’s choice of play? If yes, in what way? *

4. Did you believe the adjudicator was critical of any director’s choice of play? If yes, in what way? Yes No
5. Was the critique of each play conducted as per Section 1033 (d) (3) (B) (i) of the current C&CR. and in manner which was constructive and of value to each company? If not, why? *

5. Was the critique of each play conducted as per Section 1033 (d) (3) (B) (i) of the current C&CR. and in manner which was constructive and of value to each company? If not, why? Yes No
6. Do you believe the adjudicator demonstrated high ethical standards of behavior during the judging assignment period? If not, explain what behavior you consider a breach of ethics or a possible violation of the TTAO ethics code *

6. Do you believe the adjudicator demonstrated high ethical standards of behavior during the judging assignment period? If not, explain what behavior you consider a breach of ethics or a possible violation of the TTAO ethics code Yes No
7. In your opinion, did this adjudicator provide a critique that encouraged the development of theatre in public secondary schools? If not, explain why? *

7. In your opinion, did this adjudicator provide a critique that encouraged the development of theatre in public secondary schools? If not, explain why? Yes No
8. Did this adjudicator appear to be familiar with the technical limitations of the OAP contest? *

8. Did this adjudicator appear to be familiar with the technical limitations of the OAP contest? Yes No
9. Was this adjudicator knowledgeable of or familiar with scripts performed? If not, explain. *

9. Was this adjudicator knowledgeable of or familiar with scripts performed? If not, explain. Yes No
10. In your opinion, should the adjudicator be retained on the Accredited Adjudicator List for next year? If not, why? *

10. In your opinion, should the adjudicator be retained on the Accredited Adjudicator List for next year? If not, why? Yes No
Please use the space below for any clarification to your responses above, or use for any other comments you would like to share regarding the Contest Adjudicator(s).
Save my progress and resume later
Enter Your Email Address *

A special link to resume the form will be sent to your email address.

CONTEST EVALUATION CONTEST MANAGER'S 2023-24

CONTEST EVALUATION CONTEST MANAGER'S 2023-24

Questions About the Adjudicators