Skip to main content
University of Texas at Austin
University Interscholastic League Logo
University Interscholastic League Logo

UIL Speech Judges

If you have corrections, questions or comments regarding this information, please notify The UIL Speech and Debate department at speech@uiltexas.org or 512-471-5883.

Kodilichukwu Akazie

Current high school:

Currently coaching?: No

Conference:

Number of years coached:

Number of tournaments judged: 2

High school attended:
Sharpstown High School

Graduated high school: 2015

Participated in high school: Yes

Participated in college: No

Judging qualifications:
I have a year experience for CX debate. I have debated for the Houston Urban Debate League, in which I have won 2 semi-finalist junior varsity awards, a octo-finalist varsity award, a semi-finalist varsity award, and a number 1 speaker junior varsity award. I also won first place in the UIL district tournament, and have competed in the UIL State meet. As for my qualifications pertaining to LD, I have won first place in a UIL junior varsity academic meet.

Judging Philosophy

CX

Rounds judged: 2
Judging approach:
Policy priority: Communication skills and resolution of substantive issues are of equal importance
Evidence philosophy: Quality of evidence is more important than quantity of evidence
Paradigm: I have an offense/defense paradigm. I evaluate the round on which team has more offense on the flow. I like for the debaters to do impact calculus to make it easier for me to decide who wins. I also like to see clash, and when a concession is made by one team, I want to see the other team mention it. I do not mind spreading, but I would prefer the taglines on cards to be read slowly. I do not count the flashing of evidence as prep; however, if the team uses an unreasonable amount of time to flash, then I will start counting it as prep.

LD

Rounds judged: 3
Approach: Communication skills and resolution of substantive issues are of equal importance
Philosophy:
Organization is very important to me. I want the debaters to give road maps, and to signposts. I would like the debaters to answer their opponent's arguments in the order of which they were made. I also would like the debaters to mention when a concession has been made by the other team. I rarely see debaters spread in LD, but I do not mind it as long as they speak loudly and clearly. Lastly, I want an explanation of why the debater's value/criterion is more important than their opponents value/criterion.

Contact Information

email: kodiliakazie1@gmail.com
cell: 832 5528007
office:

Availability Information

Meet types:
Invitational District

Qualified for:
CX
LD

Travel

Region of residence:
3

I will travel to: 3