Skip to main content
University of Texas at Austin
University Interscholastic League Logo
University Interscholastic League Logo

UIL Speech Judges

If you have corrections, questions or comments regarding this information, please notify The UIL Speech and Debate department at speech@uiltexas.org or 512-471-5883.

Erin Dulaney

Current high school:
Texas A&M University

Currently coaching?: no

Conference: Not Coaching

Number of years coached:

Number of tournaments judged: 7-10

High school attended:
Hallsville High School

Graduated high school: 2010

Participated in high school: yes

Participated in college: no

Judging qualifications:
Extemporaneous Speaking: District-6th place 2007, 1st 2009, 2nd 2010 Regional-6th(?) 2009, 4th(?) 2010- I was in the top 6 National Forensics League National Qualifier-2009 Tournament of Champions National Qualifier-2010 Competed on UIL, TFA and TOC circuits Poetry/Prose: Competed in Poetry in TFA circuit Since graduated have judged numerous poetry/prose competitions. Contact Ronda Craig at Hallsville High School if more qualifications needed. LD: though trained as a policy debater, I have found that I love judging LD debate. I take my hobby of philosophy and use it while I am judging this event. Also in the past two years, I have judged more LD rounds than I have policy rounds. I use my argumentation skills that I learned in debate in general as a way to evaluate a LD round. My deep understanding of claim, warrant and impact has allowed me to easily transition to a good LD judge. Contact Racy Grant (Ferris High School) or Melissa Witt (Hallsville High School) if more qualifications needed.

Judging Philosophy

CX

Rounds judged:
Judging approach: tabula rosa
Policy priority: Equal
Evidence philosophy: equal
Paradigm: N/A

LD

Rounds judged: 30+
Approach: Equal
Philosophy:
I was a policy debater in high school. That does not mean that I judge LD in a policy framework. I vote by how the debaters tell me I should vote and why I should vote that way. A clear framework should be established so I know how to evaluate the round. I love value/criterion clash, but that does not mean to neglect the contention debate. I don't like doing work for the debaters. I feel like that is unfair to both debaters because my personal opinion can give one debater and unfair advantage. That goes back to me wanting good warranted reasons why I should vote for you. I like good sign posting so that my flow is neat and I can see exactly where arguments are supposed to be placed. This also makes it easier for me to make my decision.

Contact Information

email: eedulaney@mac.com
cell: 903 8068817
office:

Availability Information

Meet types:
Regional State Meet

Qualified for:
Prose/Poetry
Extemp
LD

Travel

Region of residence:
Area 5 Waco/Lufkin

I will travel to: 5