Skip to main content
University of Texas at Austin
University Interscholastic League Logo
University Interscholastic League Logo

UIL Speech Judges

If you have corrections, questions or comments regarding this information, please notify The UIL Speech and Debate department at speech@uiltexas.org or 512-471-5883.

Travis Cormier

Current high school:
University of Texas at Austin

Currently coaching?: yes

Conference: 3A

Number of years coached: 2

Number of tournaments judged: 11 or more

High school attended:
Hallsville HS (Hallsville, TX)

Graduated high school: 2010

Participated in high school: yes

Participated in college: no

Judging qualifications:
2010 LD 4A state champion, 2 year consulting for LD debate, judging since graduated high school. 2008, 2010 4A Informative Extemp State Bronze Medalist, judging since graduated Although I haven't participated in CX debate, I have worked with friends who competed, I have also judged it many times successfully.

Judging Philosophy

CX

Rounds judged: 10+
Judging approach: tabula rosa
Policy priority: Issues
Evidence philosophy: quality
Paradigm: I am Tab: I refer to whatever I am told to vote on regardless of how substantive I find the argument. If I am not told how to evaluate, I defer to an impact calculus of who has proven me that they will not only mitigate the most substantive impacts but also convince me of the realistic plausibility of those impacts occurring. However, I am very critical of T and Theory: if you want me to vote on it you must legitimately convince me that they are hindering your ability to debate. This means, don't run a T or Theory with a standard of preparation and then run a DA. I will not reject any argument on face, and do enjoy a GOOD kritik debate.

LD

Rounds judged: 10+
Approach: Issues
Philosophy:
Anything goes. You convince me how to evaluate the round. Run whatever type of framework you want. All that I believe is absolutely necessary is: 1. The affirmative must prove the resolution true to win my ballot. 2. The negative must either a) Disprove the resolution OR b) Disprove the affirmative to win my ballot. You can do so through any means necessary. I do not require you to run a value/criterion framework as I feel this is overlimiting the debaters. However, anything out of the ordinary must be well and properly warranted. If you go all in on a Kritik but it is not complete (link, impact, alt) then I will NEVER vote for it.

Contact Information

email: tcormier321@gmail.com
cell:
office:

Availability Information

Meet types:
Invitational District Regional CX State State Meet

Qualified for:
Extemp
CX
LD

Travel

Region of residence:
Area 1 Austin/San Antonio

I will travel to: 1 2 4 5 6